Team Dynamics - Conflict Resolution Strategies Essay example

Team Dynamics - Conflict Resolution Strategies People work in groups or teams everyday whether in their career, education, political organization, church, or any other social setting. Conflict while working in teams or groups is inevitable. When taking people of different backgrounds, personalities, moral, and ethical beliefs and putting them together in a group, conflict will arise. The key to achieving your team goals is to construct and conquer your goals with keeping the greater good of the team in mind. Conflict as it arises should be combated and abated through swift and thorough resolution techniques. When dealt with properly conflict resolution can give rise to a cohesive and productive team. What Is Conflict?†¦show more content†¦Conflict arises from various sources in the team setting (Capozzoli, 1995). The most common causes of conflict are values, attitudes, needs, expectations, perceptions, resources, and personalities. As we are all raised with different values, morals come into play when the team issue deals directly or indirectly with ones values, morals, or ethics. Conflicting attitudes can bring about problems as two or more team members prove to have differing goals in mind. Individual needs can cause rifts within a team when they are not satisfied. The expectations of team members are not the same on how the goal will be met. We all have different perceptions of life situation and interpret them differently. The lack of resources needed to complete a task can cause conflict. Differing personalities play a major role in team conflict. Types of Conflict There are many types of conflict; some are beneficial while others are detrimental. All types of conflict fall into three major categories (Engleberg, Wynn, and Schuttler, 2003; Stewart, Manz, and Sims, 1999). Relationship-oriented conflict, also known as affective conflict, is brought about when team members experience interpersonal incompatibilities. Relationship conflict is usually detrimental as team members have different perceptions of communication and social skills. Whereas Task-oriented conflict, also referred to as cognitive conflict or procedural conflict, occurs when team members disagree aboutShow MoreRelatedTeam Dynamics and Conflict Resolution Strategies1089 Words   |  5 PagesTeam Dynamics and Conflict Resolution Strategies University of Phoenix â€Æ' Success in many areas of our lives, be it family, education, business, or leisure, is dependent on successful teamwork. Teams are â€Å"a number of persons associated together in work or activity†¦a group on one side†(Merriam-Webster, 2008). There are many types of teams, work teams, school teams, sports teams, families etc. â€Å"The fact remains that teams, because they are made up of imperfect human beings, are inherently dysfunctional†(Read MoreTeam Cohesion1509 Words   |  7 PagesRunning head: TEAM CONFLICT AND COHESION Team Conflict and Cohesion Mak Turno University of Phoenix July 9, 2007 Team Conflict and Cohesion The dynamics of a team relies heavily on the interaction of team members during times of conflict not just during times of agreement. Often groups seek to achieve a cohesive relationship in an effort to unite the team towards its goals. Group members can make the mistake of subverting conflict in an attempt to maintain this team unity. Conflict serves aRead MoreTeamwork in the Workplace Essay1561 Words   |  7 Pagesof teamwork and what can be accomplished when people put the strengths together. These teams consist of people from different cultures with different personalities. Conflict is inevitable when it comes to group dynamics. Conflict resolution is necessary to keep the group functioning efficiently. This paper will analyze group dynamics and focus on conflict resolution by way of communication. Teams consist of personnel with varied backgrounds, experience, education, and intellectual abilityRead MoreConflict Resolution Strategies1530 Words   |  7 PagesRunning header: CONFLICT RESOLUTION STRATEGIES Conflict Resolution Strategies Wendy L. Decker University of Phoenix Conflict Resolution Strategies In this writing, we will explore and explain strategies of conflict resolution and, encourage teams, individuals and society as a whole to use some of these ideas for their own resolution purposes. â€Å"In many cases, effective conflict resolution skills can make the difference between positive and negativeRead MoreThe Story Behind a Teams Success738 Words   |  3 Pagesinherently, there is likely to be some level of conflict within the group, especially given that there are competing ideas. We also agreed, however, that while conflict can be positive, it can also be destructive and we felt that if we were oriented towards working as a team and pushing towards solutions, this approach would defray conflict and deliver better results (Joseph, 2013). Another thing we addressed from the outset as we tried to establish a team culture was the issue of power perceptions.Read MoreThe Dynamic World Of Nursing855 Words   |  4 PagesDynamic World of Nursing Introduction The nursing world is made up of complex systems with its numerous moving parts consisting of nurses, interdisciplinary members, supporting staff, technologies, and structures. When there are interactions between two or more individuals and systems, conflicts arise (Grossman Velia, 2012).With emerging conflicts, theses systems can go into a state of disequilibrium. Change, good or bad is bound to occur. Change forces development of leadership in which nursesRead MoreDiversity and Avoiding Conflict in Project Team1415 Words   |  6 PagesDiversity and Avoiding Conflict PM/582 Executive Summary Understanding the organizations diversity, and successfully identify and handle conflict within a team environment is necessary to the success of all projects. The project leader must have the appropriate skill set to successfully understand how to lead diverse teams and identify, lead conflict in a positive manner and communicate appropriately to our customers. We want to ensure that our customers are receiving whatRead MoreAnalysis Of Franklin Equipment, Ltd.1622 Words   |  7 Pagesproject is named Project Abu Dhabi. This assessment will discuss the process that FEL utilizes in creating its’ project teams, the efficiencies and problems related to the creation of the team, as well as identify the importance of team dynamics as FEL breaks into the international marketplace. This assessment is based on the activities surrounding the Project Abu Dhabi project team. Project Abu Dhabi is important in establishing FEL in the international market. Due to political concerns, companiesRead MoreCommunication, Conflict, And Conflict1453 Words   |  6 Pages Communication and Conflict Margarita Vela COM325: Communication Conflict Instructor: Kenneth Newton March 10, 2015 Communication and Conflict Conflict is a contest or struggle between individuals with opposing values, beliefs, needs, goals, and ideas. On teams, conflict is inevitable; on the other hand, the conflict’s outcomes are not predetermined. Conflict may escalate and result in nonproductive outcomes, or it may be beneficially resolved and lead to quality outcomes (Cahn AbigailRead More Motivation and Conflict Management Essay1023 Words   |  5 Pagesand Conflict Management Organizations strive for creative ways to enhance employee motivation and resolve conflicts with the desire to have employees perform better within the workplace. To motivate one has to be motivated. Motivation within the workplace has to be constant and requiring a goal. Motivation, if not repeated will not last. Therefore, learning to determine how different organizations apply motivation theories to motivate employees, analyzing conflict management strategies and what

Policing Function Free Essays

Policing Function University of Phoenix CJ/394 – Criminal Organizations SC11BCJ06 February 13th, 2013 Policing Law enforcement in the United States is a very unique component of the criminal justice system. Police Officers are thought to be the guardians of the gate; however, there are different levels of law enforcement that police cities, counties, and states. Law enforcement is broken down into different agencies. We will write a custom essay sample on Policing Function or any similar topic only for you Order Now According to Grant and Terry (2008, p. 3-15) four levels of law enforcement exist in the United States; Most cities and counties have their own municipal and county law enforcement agencies which include city police and sheriff departments such as the Los Angeles Police Department and the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department. Each state has its level of law enforcement as well; example of state law enforcement agencies include the California Highway Patrol and the California Department of Fish and Game (DFG) Warden. On the federal level agencies such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) are accountable for all federal jurisdiction. Briefly, this report will outline the various perspectives of policing as they apply to the various agencies of law enforcement in the United States. Since the inception of the United States common laws, rules, and regulations have been enacted to preserve society; this report will identify and outline possible changes in current laws. In addition, the impact of possible changes as they apply to policing will be underlined. Levels of Policing Municipal and County As mentioned earlier, law enforcement in the United States is broken up to different levels and categories. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics (2013), United States local law enforcement makes up two-thirds of 18,000 law enforcement agencies. The first level of policing consist of the municipal and county law enforcement agencies. The aforementioned level of law enforcement is the majority of policing in the United States. Local and county law enforcement officials are by far the most depended on agency in society throughout the United States. Municipal law enforcement agencies are often seen patrolling neighborhoods, responding to calls for service or enforcing traffic laws. According to Grant and Terry (2008, p. 13), â€Å"Large local law enforcement agencies often are responsible for investigating serious violent and property crimes in their jurisdictions, compared to half of state agencies (Bureau of Justice Statistics 2000). In addition to the many duties that are bestowed on to the police, local law enforcement is called upon for non-emergency and non-essential law enforcement needs. An example of the aforementioned is a call for service because a cat is stuck in a tree; again the call is non-emergency, however it is a call for service that officers respond to daily. County level policing usually consists of the Sheriff’s Department; however, Grant and Terry (2008, p. 13) suggest some cou nties do have a larger police force that would account for the jurisdiction of a county. Grant and Terry (2008, p. 13) state, â€Å"in some jurisdictions this office is dissolved into a county police force that functions much the same as municipal police. † Typically the Sheriff’s Office assumes jurisdiction in larger unincorporated areas; the scope of their duties revolve around enforcing court orders, court summons, or working the county jails. In some counties, the Sheriff’s Department’s functioning purpose is to provide police services much like a regular police agency, Grant and Terry (2008, p. 13-14). Grant and Terry (2008, p. 14) states, â€Å"In some jurisdictions, the sheriff’s office is entirely law enforcement focused, with no other responsibilities. † State In addition to the local and county police, each state has its own category of law enforcement. In the state of California the following agencies serve as a component in law enforcement: the California Highway Patrol (CHP), the Department of Fish and Game (Warden), California Lottery Security and Law Enforcement. State Law enforcement agencies are capable of arresting and xecuting search warrants, Grant and Terry (2008, p. 14). Other functions of state level policing include state investigations, collaboration with local and county law enforcement agencies, highway traffic enforcement and investigations, and enforcing state laws. Essentially, law enforcement on the state level may conduct basic law enforcement duties; however, most state police agencies are specific such as the CHP or the California Lottery Security and Law Enforcement. Federal Federal law enforcement includes agencies such as the FBI, DEA, and the ATF. In general federal law enforcement agencies can only enforce federal laws, where as local and state law enforcement agencies have jurisdiction over local and states matters, per Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, Grant and Terry (2008, p. 15). In 2002, the Homeland Security Act was enacted; said act recognized multiple federal law enforcement agencies as part of the new Department of Homeland Security. Prior to the aforementioned act two major federal agencies were prevalent in law enforcement: the Department of Justice and the Department of Treasury, Grant and Terry (2008, p. 15). Some federal policing duties include the following: investigations, inspections, federal court, security, and protection. Changes Among the many changing laws in the United States, there are a few that could prove to be an immense impact on society, more so on policing. The recent proposal for tougher gun laws and the use of advanced technology to police society seem to be on the horizon for today’s society. On December 14th, 2012, Adam Lanza, the shooter in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting murdered twenty children and six adults; Lanza used an â€Å"assault rifle† and some other weapons to carry out the aforementioned crime. Since the Sandy Hook incident the push for tougher gun laws has been proposed, thus causing a split in society. Currently the proposal is for a ban on â€Å"assault rifles† and ammunition sales. Some of the issues revolve around identifying certain weapons as assault weapons and limiting the amount of bullets allowed in a magazine. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution states, â€Å"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed† Cornell University Law School (n. d. ). Historically, it has been proven that criminals don’t abide by the rules set forth in society. Should a tougher gun law or an assault weapons ban be imposed, the Second Amendment will be infringed on. Currently, society is split on wanting tougher gun laws; however, the other half are supportive of their right to bear arms and weapons ownership. One may wonder how this may pose as a challenge in the future of policing. The fact of the matter is law enforcement is meeting that challenge in today’s society; they are being asked to comply with a movement of recovering weapons from the streets and from responsible owners. The positive outcome from the aforementioned action revolves around recovering unwanted and potentially dangerous weapons; however, contrary to making society a safer place, the aforementioned action also promotes an opportunity for criminals to capitalize on. One should consider the negative result of not being able to have more than eight bullets, much less not owning a gun for protection. Criminals do not abide by the rules and regulations that have been enacted, thus there lack of concern for others. Considering the aforementioned point, the rise is crime, specifically violent crimes such as robbery, assault with deadly weapons, murder, and home invasions are all very possible. It is possible for the police to be understaffed while trying to combat the forecasted spike in crime. In addition, lots of innocent people could potentially be harmed or killed. Technology The recent proposal for using unmanned drones to assist police officers in the field is being met with mixed emotions as well. Many citizens feel as if their Constitutional rights are being violated; particularly the Fourth Amendment in the United States Constitution. Unmanned Drones also known as Unmanned Arial Vehicles (UAV) would assist the police departments in field operations as they fly around and provide vital real time information giving law enforcement the edge on crime fighting. The issue that arises centers around the government violating the Fourth Amendment; having the UAV fly around in a large city such as Los Angeles makes many citizens wonder if the police are using this for actual police work as opposed to randomly checking on them for non-policing monitoring. The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution suggests United States citizens should be secure in heir own person and home; in addition that Amendment also include their personal papers and effects shall be free of unreasonable search or seizure from the government, and no warrant issued without probable cause. With a UAV flying around the city it is safe to assume many citizens will feel violated. In the future this will most definitely be an asset to law enforcem ent; however, it will come at the cost of freedom, privacy, and trust in law enforcement. Conclusion In this report the author briefly outlined the different levels of law enforcement in the United States. Each level of policing has certain function within society, from the local and county level to the federal level. Though every level has different functions throughout law enforcement, they still seem to provide basic services in regards to policing; in addition, all levels collaborate amongst themselves to help combat crime and provide solutions to preserve peace and a sense of security in society. Furthermore, two examples of current laws have been expanded on, giving a forecast of how they will change and impact law enforcement in the future. References Cornell University Law Shcool: Second Amendment. (n. d. ). Retrieved fromhttp://www. law. cornell. edu/constitution/second_amendment Cornell University Law Shcool: Fourth Amendment. (n. d. ). Retrieved fromhttp://www. law. cornell. edu/constitution/fourth_amendment Grant, H. B. , Terry, K. J. (2008). Law Enforcement in the 21st Century (2nd ed. ). Retrievedfrom The University of Phoenix eBook Collection database. Bureau of Justice Statistics: Local Police. (2013). Retrieved fromhttp://bjs. ojp. usdoj. gov/index. cfm? ty=tptid=71 How to cite Policing Function, Papers

The Presidential Election Of 2000 Essay Research free essay sample

The Presidential Election Of 2000 Essay, Research Paper The Presidential election of 2000 was one of the most controversial and dissentious political events in recent history, absolutely exemplifying the split between the two political parties and the about uncannily equality of these groups. However, this election besides showed the state that although many issues maintain these two parties in two distinguishable cantonments, an equal figure of issues drew really similar responses from the Republican campaigner, George W. Bush, and the Democratic campaigner, Al Gore. Truly, the past few old ages have seen a gravity on the parts of both parties towards a in-between land that has frustrated utmost conservativists and progressives ; two minor campaigners, Ralph Nader and Pat Buchannan, illustrated this conformance by their commands in this election on, severally, more broad and more conservative platforms. Nader # 8217 ; s claims of two indistinguishable major party campaigners were exagerrated: the two work forces did hold greatly changin g point of views on such issues as wellness attention, abortion, revenue enhancement reform, instruction, and the environment. However, other issues, such as run finance reform, gun control, the war on drugs, and foreign policy, have drawn unusually similar stances from the two work forces. The issue of revenue enhancements became cardinal to the 2000 election when Republican campaigner George W. Bush promised to utilize a tierce of the current excess to ordain a significant revenue enhancement cut. This $ 1.6 trillion dollar amount would let a revenue enhancement cut in each income bracket, an addition in child revenue enhancement credits and credits for married twosomes, and a abrogation of the estate revenue enhancement. Gore wanted to cut down this $ 1.6 trillion dollar amount to $ 480 million and restrict the revenue enhancement cuts to those he feels need them most, the revenue enhancement remunerators in the lower brackets. He besides wanted to make credits for college tuition, preschool, attention for an aged parent, the purchase of a fuel-efficient auto, and retirement-savings histories, all credits designed to give revenue enhancement interruptions to those who need them ( Frank 72 ) . The differences in the two campaigners # 8217 ; positions on abortion will chiefly act upon the assignment of new supreme tribunal justnesss. Several justnesss are looking towards retirement within the following four old ages. Bush would name justnesss such as Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia, while Gore would name justnesss such as Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. These justnesss would besides hold an consequence on verifiers for spiritual schools and affirmatory action. Bush would back up censoring partial abortions, but, while Gore claims he does non back up these abortions, he would oppose censoring them. Another important difference refering abortion concerns the abortion pill known as RU-486. This pill is taken orally after construct and kills the foetus as in a physician assisted abortion. Bush opposes legalising this pill, while Gore supports it ( Frank 72 ) . Bush and Gore differ refering wellness attention in their methods of guaranting that all households are medically insured. Bush wants to give a $ 2,000 revenue enhancement recognition to uninsured households in order to promote the purchase of insurance. Gore would wish to trust on the Children # 8217 ; s Health Insurance Program to let low- and middle-income kids # 8217 ; s parents to purchase subsidised insurance. Both campaigners would wish to give patients the right to action HMOs, but Bush would wish this right to be much more restricted than Gore would. Gore wants to continue Medicare by forcing $ 435 billion dollars into the # 8220 ; lockbox # 8221 ; , while Bush would turn Medicare into more of an insurance based operation than societal security based, leting the money to be used for insurance and prescription drugs ( Frank 72 ) . Another major bone of contention between the two campaigners involves environmental concerns. Bush and Gore disagree on where the demands of the state outweigh the demands of the Earth. A focal point of these environmental concerns has been the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. Bush would wish to bore in this modesty in order to increase the United States # 8217 ; crude oil militias and cut down the monetary values of gasolene. However, Gore would wish to maintain this modesty pure as it contains several endangered species and is a alone preserved natural environment. Bush is besides an opposition of the Clean Air and Water Acts, favored undertakings of Gore, because he feels they limit the autonomous powers of single provinces ( Globe A28 ) . These issues illustrate that there are surely differences between the parties. However, there are many issues that, when presented to the campaigners, made clear the fact that both campaigners were scrambling towards a in-between land that would be appealing to more electors. Campaign finance reform is a sore topic for many in Washington, particularly those who feel that the state is run by particular involvement groups who donate important amoun T of money to presidential campaigners, anticipating political favours in return. Both Bush and Gore are no alien to hefty contributions, and have been known to do determinations while believing towards their parties’ piggy Bankss. Neither campaigner is really likely to be a innovator in the restriction of contributions. Both want to censor soft money, both are loath to wholly fade out the concatenation of money that keeps their parties’ political runs traveling in the involvement of just drama ( Presidential Argument ) . This similarity in the two campaigners was amplified by the presence of Senator John McCain in the Republican primaries. McCain’s steadfast lobbying for stricter regulations for run contributions stressed that the two major party campaigners are all excessively unwilling to give up support. Gun control is another issue that traditionally was the beginning of fierce contention between Republicans and Democrats, but this twelvemonth found itself centralized by the demand for swing ballots. Both want to concentrate on leting huntsmans and sportswomans to maintain their guns, but want to maintain these arms out of the incorrect custodies. Both besides want to censor automatic arms and high-capacity ammo cartridge holders. There are elusive differences in the two work forces? s policies. Bush wants to protect gun makers from cases, while Gore does non. The similarities and disparities between the two work forces? s policies can be seen in these replies during the October 17, 2000, argument in St. Louis. Q: Do you back up the Brady Bill? Shrubs: Law-abiding citizens ought to be allowed to protect their households. We ought to maintain guns out of the custodies of people who shouldn? Ts have them. That? s why I? m for instant background cheques at gun shows. I? m for trigger locks. I think we ought to raise the age at which juveniles can hold a gun. I besides believe that the best manner to do certain that we maintain our society safe is to keep people accountable for interrupting the jurisprudence. If we catch person illicitly selling a gun, there needs to be a effect. The federal authorities can assist. Gore: All my proposals are focused on that job: gun safety. None of my proposals would hold any consequence on huntsmans or sportswomans or people who use rifles. They? rhenium aimed at the existent job. Let? s have a three-day waiting period, A chilling off, so we can hold a background cheque to do certain that felons and people who truly shouldn? Ts have guns Dons? T acquire them. Both work forces besides have a similar place on the war on drugs. Predictably, they differ on the success of the Clinton-Gore war on drugs: Gore says that every bit long as disbursement was maintained, the drug war was successful ; Bush says that their policy was inconsistent and therefore doomed to neglect. Both feel that stronger Torahs are the reply, experiencing that their preventative attack is working. Both campaigners are similar in the interventionist action they are willing to take. In the presidential argument at Wake Forest on October 11, 2000, both work forces were unusually similar in their support of some of the interventionist actions of the past 20 old ages. They merely differed on two counts: Bush felt that action in Lebanon was necessary, and Gore did non, while the contrary was true for action in Haiti. Refering Grenada, Panama, the Persian Gulf, Bosnia, and Kosovo, both felt that military intercession was necessary. Merely when speech production of intercession in Somalia did both campaigners feel that military adjutant was unneeded and even harmful. This understanding of the two campaigners is non much of a surprise, since in 1990 and 1991, Gore was one of the few senators to openly support Desert Shield and Desert Storm. This has led to defeat among electors who favor a more isolationist point of view. These similarities in the two campaigners led to an interesting election twelvemonth full of recounts and contention. In the primaries, two strong rivals in the signifiers of John McCain and Bill Bradley made a much stronger demoing than smugglers up frequently do in these primaries. Two 3rd party campaigners, Ralph Nader and Pat Buchanan, picked up electors that were disillusioned by this gravity towards the center. However, claims that this was basically a one party race were slightly overdone. The campaigners took differing point of views on several cardinal issues. That kept them from looking, as Ralph Nader put it, like? Tweedle-Dee and Tweedle-Dum. ? All of these factors contributed to one of the most politically interesting elections in the history of the United States. Frank, Mitch, and Andrew Goldstein. ? The Four Big Differences. ? Time. Nov. 6, 2000: 72. Presidential Debate, Boston MA October 3, 2000. Presidential Debate, Winston-Salem NC October 11, 2000. Presidential Argument, St. Louis MO October 17, 2000. ? The Issues. ? The Boston Globe. Nov. 3, 2000: A28.